EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-105/08 P: Appeal brought on 26 February 2008 by Kris Van Neyghem against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal delivered on 13 December 2007 in Case F-73/06, Van Neyghem v Commission

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62008TN0105

62008TN0105

January 1, 2008
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C 107/39

(Case T-105/08 P)

(2008/C 107/66)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Kris Van Neyghem (Vissenken, Belgium) (represented by S. Rodrigues and C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings: Commission of the European Communities

Form of order sought by the appellant

declare the present appeal admissible;

annul the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) delivered on 13 December 2007 in Case F-73/06;

uphold the claims for annulment and for compensation submitted by the appellant to the Civil Service Tribunal;

order the Commission to pay the costs of both instances.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In his appeal, the appellant is seeking the annulment of the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (the ‘Tribunal’) dismissing his application, on the one hand, for the annulment of the decision of the selection board in general competition EPSO/A/19/04 not to admit the applicant to the oral test in that competition and, on the other, for damages for the material and non-material damage which he allegedly suffered.

In support of his appeal, the appellant pleads a misunderstanding of evidence produced before the Tribunal, namely, a copy of the written test.

The applicant pleads, in addition, an error in the Tribunal's reasoning concerning the absence of a manifest error of assessment on the part of the president of the selection board in the comparison between the mark given to the applicant and the literal assessment in the evaluation sheet.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia