I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-792/14 P) (<span class="super">1</span>)
((Appeal - Civil Service - Officials - Remuneration - EEAS staff posted to a third country - Withdrawal of the allowance for living conditions of staff posted to Mauritius - Failure to adopt the GIP for Article 10 of Annex X to the Staff Regulations))
(2016/C 156/48)
Language of the case: French
Appellant: Eric Vanhalewyn (Grand-Baie, Mauritius) (represented by: S. Orlandi and T. Martin, lawyers)
Other party to the proceedings: European External Action Service (EEAS) (represented by: S. Marquardt and M. Silva, acting as Agents)
Appeal against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (Third Chamber) of 25 September 2014 in Osorio and Others v EEAS (F-101/13, ECR-SC, EU:F:2014:223), seeking to have that judgment set aside.
The Court:
1.Sets aside the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (Third Chamber) of 25 September 2014 in Osorio and Others v EEAS (F-101/13) in so far as it dismisses the action brought by Mr Eric Vanhalewyn;
2.Annuls the decision of the Chief Operating Officer of the European External Action Service (EEAS) of 19 December 2012 revising the amount of the allowance for living conditions (ALC) granted to staff posted in a third country in so far as that decision withdraws the ALC laid down in Article 10 of Annex X to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union for officials and other servants posted to Mauritius;
3.Orders the EEAS to pay the costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 46, 9.2.2015.