EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-792/14 P: Judgment of the General Court of 17 March 2016 — Vanhalewyn v EEAS (Appeal — Civil Service — Officials — Remuneration — EEAS staff posted to a third country — Withdrawal of the allowance for living conditions of staff posted to Mauritius — Failure to adopt the GIP for Article 10 of Annex X to the Staff Regulations)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014TA0792

62014TA0792

March 17, 2016
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C 156/37

(Case T-792/14 P) (<span class="super">1</span>)

((Appeal - Civil Service - Officials - Remuneration - EEAS staff posted to a third country - Withdrawal of the allowance for living conditions of staff posted to Mauritius - Failure to adopt the GIP for Article 10 of Annex X to the Staff Regulations))

(2016/C 156/48)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: Eric Vanhalewyn (Grand-Baie, Mauritius) (represented by: S. Orlandi and T. Martin, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings: European External Action Service (EEAS) (represented by: S. Marquardt and M. Silva, acting as Agents)

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (Third Chamber) of 25 September 2014 in Osorio and Others v EEAS (F-101/13, ECR-SC, EU:F:2014:223), seeking to have that judgment set aside.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Sets aside the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (Third Chamber) of 25 September 2014 in Osorio and Others v EEAS (F-101/13) in so far as it dismisses the action brought by Mr Eric Vanhalewyn;

2.Annuls the decision of the Chief Operating Officer of the European External Action Service (EEAS) of 19 December 2012 revising the amount of the allowance for living conditions (ALC) granted to staff posted in a third country in so far as that decision withdraws the ALC laid down in Article 10 of Annex X to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union for officials and other servants posted to Mauritius;

3.Orders the EEAS to pay the costs.

(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 46, 9.2.2015.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia