- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-43/22: Action brought on 21 January 2022 — Sanrio v EUIPO — Miroglio Fashion (SANRIO CHARACTERS)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TN0043
62022TN0043
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
14.3.2022
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 119/54
(Case T-43/22)
(2022/C 119/76)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Sanrio Co. Ltd (Tokyo, Japan) (represented by: V. Schmitz-Fohrmann, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Miroglio Fashion Srl (Alba, Italy)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark SANRIO CHARACTERS — Application for registration No 12 565 974
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 16 November 2021 in Case R 2460/2020-2
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision to the extent the opposition was upheld and European Union trade mark application No 12 565 974 was rejected and to reject the opposition in its entirety;
—order EUIPO to bear the costs of the proceedings.
Plea in law
—The Board of Appeal made an incorrect global assessment of the likelihood of confusion between the trade marks.