I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-726/20) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Action for annulment - State aid - Guidelines on certain State aid measures in the context of the system for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading post-2021 - Eligible sectors - Exclusion of the fertiliser manufacturing sector - Lack of direct concern - Inadmissibility)
(2022/C 73/55)
Language of the case: English
Applicants: Grupa Azoty S.A. (Tarnów, Poland), Azomureș S.A. (Târgu Mureş, Romania), Lipasmata Kavalas LTD Ypokatastima Allodapis (Palaio Fáliro, Greece) (represented by: D. Haverbeke, L. Ruessmann and P. Sellar, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Bouchagiar and G. Braga da Cruz, acting as Agents)
Application under Article 263 TFEU for the annulment in part of the Communication from the Commission of 25 September 2020 entitled ‘Guidelines on certain State aid measures in the context of the system for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading post-2021’ (OJ 2020 C 317, p. 5).
1.The action is dismissed as inadmissible.
2.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application to intervene submitted by the EFTA Surveillance Authority.
3.Grupa Azoty S.A., Azomureș S.A. and Lipasmata Kavalas LTD Ypokatastima Allodapis shall bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.
4.The EFTA Surveillance Authority shall bear the costs relating to its application to intervene.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 72, 1.3.2021.