- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-149/24, United Media Services: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 December 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie – Romania) – United Media Services SRL v Consiliul Concurenţei (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law – Article 4(3) TEU – Procedural autonomy – Principles of equivalence and effectiveness – Legal certainty – Right to an effective remedy – Final decision of a national court that is incompatible with a subsequent decision of the Court – Decision of a Constitutional Court finding that a provision of national law on the basis of which a judgment was delivered is incompatible with the Constitution of the Member State concerned – Request for revision – Different limitation periods)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024CB0149
62024CB0149
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2025/702
10.2.2025
(Case C-149/24, United Media Services)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law - Article 4(3) TEU - Procedural autonomy - Principles of equivalence and effectiveness - Legal certainty - Right to an effective remedy - Final decision of a national court that is incompatible with a subsequent decision of the Court - Decision of a Constitutional Court finding that a provision of national law on the basis of which a judgment was delivered is incompatible with the Constitution of the Member State concerned - Request for revision - Different limitation periods)
(C/2025/702)
Language of the case: Romanian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Appellant on a point of law: United Media Services SRL
Respondent: Consiliul Concurenţei
Operative part of the order
Article 4(3) TEU, read in the light of the principles of equivalence, effectiveness and legal certainty, must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation under which an action for revision of a final judicial decision for infringement of EU law must be brought within a month from notification of that decision, although an action for revision alleging that the final judicial decision at issue was adopted on the basis of a national provision which was subsequently declared unconstitutional by a decision of the Constitutional Court of the Member State concerned may be brought within three months from publication of that decision in the Official Journal of that Member State, provided that the practical consequences of that finding of unconstitutionality flow directly from that decision of the Constitutional Court.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/702/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—
*
Language of the case: Romanian.
—