EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

FINALREALM / UNITED BISCUITS

M.1830

FINALREALM / UNITED BISCUITS
February 2, 2000
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

EN

Case No COMP/M.1830 - FINALREALM / UNITED BISCUITS

Only the English text is available and authentic.

REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE

Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 03/02/2000

Also available in the CELEX database Document No 300M1830

Office for Official Publications of the European Communities L-2985 Luxembourg

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES

Brussels, 3.02.2000 SG (2000) D/101201

In the published version of this decision, some information has been omitted pursuant to Article 17(2) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 concerning non-disclosure of business secrets and other confidential information. The omissions are shown thus […]. Where possible the information omitted has been replaced by ranges of figures or a general description.

PUBLIC VERSION

To the notifying parties

Dear Sirs,

1.On 22.12.1999 the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration by which PAI Management SAS (“PAI”) and Cinven Limited (“Cinven”) will acquire joint control, through Finalrealm Limited, of United Biscuits (Holdings) plc by way of a public bid announced on 17.12.1999 and posted to shareholders on 14.01.2000.

2.After examination of the notification, the Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of Council Regulation (EEC) No. 4064/89 and does not raise serious doubts as to its compatibility with the common market and with the EEA Agreement.

I. THE PARTIES

3.PAI is an independent private equity affiliate of Paribas, a publicly listed company incorporated in France and owned by the Banque Nationale de Paris. PAI advises Paribas on the management of its equity holdings and it manages the PAI LBO Fund, licensed by COB, the French Stock Exchange regulator. Cinven is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Cinven Group Limited, incorporated in England. The Cinven Group is a venture capital business, providing investment management, advice and services.

4.United Biscuits (“UB”) is a publicly listed company incorporated in Scotland with subsidiaries and sales worldwide. UB’s principal activity is the manufacture and sale of biscuits, cakes and savoury snacks.

Rue de la Loi 200, B-1049 Bruxelles/Wetstraat 200, B-1049 Brussel - Belgium Telephone: exchange 299.11.11 Telex: COMEU B 21877. Telegraphic address: COMEUR Brussels.

II. THE OPERATION

5.The operation is the proposed acquisition, by public offer, of the entire share capital of UB by Finalrealm, a company incorporated in England and Wales and established as a vehicle for this transaction.

III. CONCENTRATION

6.The transaction, by which PAI and Cinven acquire joint control, through Finalrealm, of UB is a concentration within the meaning of article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation.

IV. COMMUNITY DIMENSION

7.The combined aggregate worldwide turnover of the undertakings concerned exceeds EUR 5 billion (PAI exceeds €50,000 million; Cinven exceeds €7,000 million; and UB exceeds €2,000 million). The aggregate Community wide turnover of each party exceeds EUR 250 million. PAI and Cinven do not achieve more than two-thirds of their turnover in one and the same Member State. The operation therefore has a Community dimension.

V. COMPETITIVE ASSESSMENT

8.Neither PAI nor Cinven is currently active in the manufacture and sale of biscuits, cakes and savoury snacks. It is therefore not necessary to define the relevant product or geographic markets because there are no affected markets within the meaning of the Merger Regulation. Effective competition would therefore not be significantly impeded in the EEA or any substantial part of that area.

VI. CONCLUSION

9.For the above reasons, the Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the common market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 and Article 57 of the EEA Agreement.

For the Commission,

Mario MONTI Member of the Commission

1Turnover calculated in accordance with Article 5(1) of the Merger Regulation and the Commission Notice on the calculation of turnover (OJ C66, 2.3.1998, p25). To the extent that figures include turnover for the period before 1.1.1999, they are calculated on the basis of average ECU exchange rates and translated into EUR on a one-for-one basis.

2

EUC

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia