- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-241/17: Judgment of the General Court of 13 November 2018 — Poland v Commission (EAGF and EAFRD — Expenditure excluded from financing — Implementing Regulation (EU) No 585/2011 — Temporary exceptional support measures for the fruit and vegetable sector following a deadly enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli (E. coli) outbreak — Non-harvesting operations — Extent of the compensation in favour of producers who performed such operations — Expenditure incurred by Poland — Obligation to state reasons)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017TA0241
62017TA0241
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
14.1.2019
Official Journal of the European Union
C 16/42
(Case T-241/17) (*)
((EAGF and EAFRD - Expenditure excluded from financing - Implementing Regulation (EU) No 585/2011 - Temporary exceptional support measures for the fruit and vegetable sector following a deadly enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli (E. coli) outbreak - Non-harvesting operations - Extent of the compensation in favour of producers who performed such operations - Expenditure incurred by Poland - Obligation to state reasons))
(2019/C 16/50)
Language of the case: Polish
Parties
Applicant: Republic of Poland (represented by: B. Majczyna, M. Pawlicka, K. Straś and B. Paziewska, acting as Agents)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Stobiecka-Kuik and D. Milanowska, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/264 of 14 February 2017 excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (OJ 2017 L 39, p. 12), in so far as it excludes from European Union financing expenditure in the amount of EUR 4 438 056,66 incurred by the payment agency accredited by the Republic of Poland.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders the Republic of Poland to pay the costs.
(*)
Language of the case: Polish.
* * *
(1) OJ C 195, 19.6.2017.