- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-84/20 P: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 28 October 2020 — Archimandritis Sarantis Sarantos, Protopresvyteros Ioannis Fotopoulos, Protopresvyteros Antonios Bousdekis, Protopresvyteros Vasileios Kokolakis, Estia Paterikon Meleton, Christos Papasotiriou, Charalampos Andralis v European Parliament, Council of the European Union (Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — EU citizenship — Strengthening the security of identity cards of Union citizens and of residence documents issued to Union citizens and their family members exercising their right of free movement — Regulation (EU) 2019/1157 — Action for annulment — Legal standing — Lack of individual concern — Article 19 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union — Obligation for a party to be represented by a lawyer — Applicant, also a lawyer, acting in his own name by signing the application himself, without engaging the services of a third-party lawyer to represent him — Appeal manifestly unfounded)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020CB0084
62020CB0084
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 44/12
(Case C-84/20 P) (1)
(Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - EU citizenship - Strengthening the security of identity cards of Union citizens and of residence documents issued to Union citizens and their family members exercising their right of free movement - Regulation (EU) 2019/1157 - Action for annulment - Legal standing - Lack of individual concern - Article 19 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union - Obligation for a party to be represented by a lawyer - Applicant, also a lawyer, acting in his own name by signing the application himself, without engaging the services of a third-party lawyer to represent him - Appeal manifestly unfounded)
(2021/C 44/17)
Language of the case: Greek
Parties
Appellants: Archimandritis Sarantis Sarantos, Protopresvyteros Ioannis Fotopoulos, Protopresvyteros Antonios Bousdekis, Protopresvyteros Vasileios Kokolakis, Estia Paterikon Meleton, Christos Papasotiriou, Charalampos Andralis (represented by: C. Papasotiriou, dikigoros)
Other parties to the proceedings: European Parliament, Council of the European Union
Operative part of the order
The Court:
1.Dismisses the appeal brought by Mr Christos Papasotirou as inadmissible;
2.Dismisses the appeal brought by Mr Sarantis Sarantos, Mr Ioannis Fotopoulos, Mr Antonios Bousdekis, Mr Vasileios Kokolakis, Mr Estia Paterikon Meleton and Mr Charalampos Andralis as manifestly unfounded;
3.Orders Mr Sarantis Sarantos, Mr Ioannis Fotopoulos, Mr Antonios Bousdekis, Mr Vasileios Kokolakis, Mr Estia Paterikon Meleton, Mr Christos Papasotirou and Mr Charalampos Andralis to pay their own costs.
(1)
OJ C 161, 11.5.2020
* * *
Language of the case: Greek