- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-514/10: Judgment of the General Court of 21 June 2012 — Fruit of the Loom v OHIM — Blueshore Management (FRUIT) (Community trade mark — Revocation proceedings — Community word mark FRUIT — Non-use — Article 15(1)(a) and Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62010TA0514
62010TA0514
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
28.7.2012
Official Journal of the European Union
C 227/19
(Case T-514/10)(<span class="super">1</span>)
(Community trade mark - Revocation proceedings - Community word mark FRUIT - Non-use - Article 15(1)(a) and Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
2012/C 227/28
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Fruit of the Loom, Inc. (Bowling Green, Kentucky, United States) (represented by: S. Malynicz, Barrister, and V. Marsland, Solicitor)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: initially by S. Schäffner, subsequently by G. Schneider, subsequently by D. Botis, and finally by J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Blueshore Management SA (Cernusco Sul Naviglio, Italy) (represented by: S. Corona and G. Ciccone, lawyers)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 30 August 2010 (Case R 1686/2008-4) concerning revocation proceedings between Blueshore Management SA and Fruit of the Loom, Inc.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Fruit of the Loom, Inc. to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by OHIM;
3.Orders Blueshore Management SA to bear its own costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 13, 15.1.2011.