I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-2/16) (<a id="ntc1-C_2017022EN.01003201-E0001" href="#ntr1-C_2017022EN.01003201-E0001"> (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)</a>)
((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - International registration designating the European Union - Figurative mark Pret A Diner - Earlier EU figurative mark PRET A MANGER - Earlier national word mark PRET - Relative ground for refusal - Genuine use of the earlier mark - Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Unfair advantage taken of the distinctiveness or the repute of the earlier marks - Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009))
(2017/C 022/43)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: K&K Group AG (Cham, Switzerland) (represented by: N. Lützenrath, U. Rademacher, C. Fürsen and N. Bertram, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervening before the General Court: Pret A Manger (Europe) Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: M. Edenborough QC)
Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 October 2015 (Case R 2825/2014-5), relating to opposition proceedings between Pret A Manger (Europe) and K&K Group.
The Court:
1.Dismisses the appeal;
2.Orders K&K Group AG to pay the costs.
(<a id="ntr1-C_2017022EN.01003201-E0001" href="#ntc1-C_2017022EN.01003201-E0001">(<span class="super">1</span>)</a> OJ C 78, 29.2.2016)