- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-807/23, Jones Day: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 29 December 2023 – DF v Rechtsanwaltskammer Wien
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023CN0807
62023CN0807
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2024/2409
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 29 December 2023 — DF v Rechtsanwaltskammer Wien
(Case C-807/23, Jones Day)
(C/2024/2409)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: DF
Respondent: Rechtsanwaltskammer Wien
Question referred
Must Article 45 TFEU on freedom of movement for workers be interpreted as precluding national legislation under which, as a condition for inclusion in the list of Austrian trainee lawyers, part of the practical training (training period) of a trainee lawyer must be completed as a trainee lawyer with a lawyer established in Austria, that is to say, within the national territory (‘core period’), whereas, for that part of the practical training (training period), activity for a lawyer established in another Member State is not sufficient, even if that activity is carried out there under the supervision of a lawyer admitted in Austria practising in the field of Austrian law?
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2409/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—
* * *
—