EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.
Case C-659/23 P: Appeal brought on 8 November 2023 by LD against the order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 29 August 2023 in Case T-633/22, LD v EUIPO
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023CN0659
62023CN0659
November 8, 2023
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2024/4303
15.7.2024
(Case C-659/23 P)
(C/2024/4303)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Appellant: LD (represented by: H. Tettenborn, Rechtsanwalt)
Other party to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office
By order of 4 June 2024, the Court of Justice (Ninth Chamber) dismissed the appeal as being, in part, manifestly inadmissible and, in part, manifestly unfounded. Further, the Court held that LD should bear her own costs.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4303/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—
EurLex Case Law
AI-Powered Case Law Search
Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions
Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free TrialAt Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.