I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
C series
—
(C/2025/3427)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: Ecuphar (Oostkamp, Belgium) (represented by: I. Miralles Llorca, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Société des produits Nestlé SA (Vevey, Switzerland)
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark proGlan –Application for registration No 18 652 996
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 26 February 2025 in Case R 1039/2024–4
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO and the intervener, if any, to pay the costs.
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3427/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—