- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-72/22 PPU: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 30 June 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas — Lithuania) — M.A. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Asylum and immigration policy — Directive 2011/95/EU — Article 4 — Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection — Directive 2013/32/EU — Articles 6 and 7 — Standards for the reception of applicants for international protection — Article 18 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Directive 2013/33/EU — Article 8 — Detention of the applicant — Ground for detention — Protection of national security or public order — Detention of the applicant for having entered the territory of the European Union unlawfully)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022CA0072
62022CA0072
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 318/18
(Case C-72/22 PPU) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Urgent preliminary ruling procedure - Asylum and immigration policy - Directive 2011/95/EU - Article 4 - Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection - Directive 2013/32/EU - Articles 6 and 7 - Standards for the reception of applicants for international protection - Article 18 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Directive 2013/33/EU - Article 8 - Detention of the applicant - Ground for detention - Protection of national security or public order - Detention of the applicant for having entered the territory of the European Union unlawfully)
(2022/C 318/25)
Language of the case: Lithuanian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: M.A.
Intervener: Valstybės sienos apsaugos tarnyba
Operative part of the judgment
1.Articles 6 and 7(1) of Directive 2013/32/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection must be interpreted as precluding legislation of a Member State pursuant to which, in the event of a declaration of a state of war or a state of emergency or a declaration of an emergency due to a mass influx of foreigners, illegally staying third-country nationals are de facto denied the opportunity of having access, in the territory of that Member State, to the procedure for examining an application for international protection.
2.Article 8(2) and (3) of Directive 2013/33/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 laying down standards for the reception of persons seeking international protection must be interpreted as precluding legislation of a Member State under which, in the event of a declaration of a state of war or a state of emergency or a declaration of an emergency due to a mass influx of foreigners, an applicant for asylum may be detained on the sole ground that his or her stay in the territory of that Member State is unlawful.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 171, 25.4.2022.
Language of the case: Lithuanian