EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-392/23, Rustrans: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bacău (Romania) lodged on 27 June 2023 — Rustrans SRL v Ministerul Agriculturii și Dezvoltării Rurale — Direcția Generală Pescuit — Autoritatea de Management pentru POPAM

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023CN0392

62023CN0392

June 27, 2023
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

Series C

C/2023/8

(Case C-392/23, Rustrans)

(C/2023/8)

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Rustrans SRL

Respondent: Ministerul Agriculturii și Dezvoltării Rurale — Direcția Generală Pescuit — Autoritatea de Management pentru POPAM

Questions referred

1.For the purpose of modernising an aquaculture unit by means of the investment referred to in Article 48(1)(c) of Regulation No 508/2014, does the contribution in kind of land adjoining ponds, aquaculture plants or tanks made of concrete, as well as buildings present on that land, constitute eligible expenditure within the meaning of Article 69 of Regulation No 1303/2013 where modernisation of the aquaculture unit is carried out through the purchase of equipment, technological machinery and materials for the fish farm?

2.Must Article 48(1)(c) of Regulation No 508/2014, read in conjunction with Articles 4 and 125 of Regulation No 1303/2013 and Article 33 of Regulation 2018/1046 on the principle of sound financial management, be interpreted as meaning that there is no direct link between the modernisation of an aquaculture unit by means of expenditure on the purchase of equipment, technological machinery and materials for the fish farm located on the land and the contribution in kind of the land adjoining concrete ponds, land adjoining ponds for aquaculture plants, land adjoining concrete tanks and buildings located on that land?

3.Does the 10 % limit referred to in Article 69(3)(b) of Regulation No 1303/2013 apply only to contributions consisting of land and buildings for which a cash payment is made for the purposes of a lease agreement [referred to in Article 69(1)(d)] or does it also apply to the contribution in kind [consisting of] land and immovable property belonging (not rented) to the beneficiaries?

4.Does Article 69 of Regulation No 1303/2013 set a limit of 10 % only for the contribution in kind consisting of land or does it set a limit of 10 % for the contribution in kind consisting of land and buildings?

*

Regulation (EU) No 508/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and repealing Council Regulations (EC) No 2328/2003, (EC) No 861/2006, (EC) No 1198/2006 and (EC) No 791/2007 and Regulation (EU) No 1255/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ 2014 L 149, p. 1).

Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 laying down common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund, the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 (OJ 2013 L 347, p. 320).

Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 July 2018 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union, amending Regulations (EU) No 1296/2013, (EU) No 1301/2013, (EU) No 1303/2013, (EU) No 1304/2013, (EU) No 1309/2013, (EU) No 1316/2013, (EU) No 223/2014, (EU) No 283/2014, and Decision No 541/2014/EU and repealing Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 (OJ 2018, L 193, p. 1).

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/8/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

* * *

Language of the case: Romanian.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia