I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
()
2010/C 209/75
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Applicant: KNUT IP Management Ltd. (London, England) (represented by: C. Jaeckel, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Zoologischer Garten Berlin AG (Berlin, Germany)
—annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 17 March 2010 in Case R 650/2009-1;
—order the defendant to pay the costs including those of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal.
Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant.
Community trade mark concerned: Word mark ‘KNUT — DER EISBÄR’ for goods and services in Classes 9, 16, 25, 28 and 41.
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Zoologischer Garten Berlin AG.
Mark or sign cited in opposition: German word mark ‘KNUD’ for goods and services in Classes 9, 16 and 28; German word mark ‘Knut — der Eisbär’ for goods and services in Classes 16, 25, 28 and 41; German word mark ‘KNUT’ for goods and services in Classes 3, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 21, 24, 25, 28, 29, 30, 32, 33, 35, 39, 41, 42 and 43; German word mark ‘KNUT’ for goods and services in Classes 16, 18, 21, 25, 28, 35, 41 and 42.
Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition upheld in part.
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal allowed and opposition upheld in full.
Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, because there is no likelihood of confusion between the marks at issue.
*
Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).