- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-301/14: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 3 December 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht — Germany) — Pfotenhilfe-Ungarn e.V. v Ministerium für Energiewende, Landwirtschaft, Umwelt und ländliche Räume des Landes Schleswig-Holstein (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EC) No 1/2005 — Article 1(5) — Protection of animals during transport — Transport of stray dogs from one Member State to another by an animal protection association — Concept of ‘economic activity’ — Directive 90/425/EEC — Article 12 — Concept of ‘dealers engaging in intra-Community trade’)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014CA0301
62014CA0301
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 38/5
(Case C-301/14) (<span class="super">1</span>)
((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Regulation (EC) No 1/2005 - Article 1(5) - Protection of animals during transport - Transport of stray dogs from one Member State to another by an animal protection association - Concept of ‘economic activity’ - Directive 90/425/EEC - Article 12 - Concept of ‘dealers engaging in intra-Community trade’))
(2016/C 038/06)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Pfotenhilfe-Ungarn e.V.
Defendant: Ministerium für Energiewende, Landwirtschaft, Umwelt und ländliche Räume des Landes Schleswig-Holstein
Intervener: Vertreter des Bundesinteresses beim Bundesverwaltungsgericht
Operative part of the judgment
1.The concept of ‘economic activity’ within the meaning of Article 1(5) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2005 of 22 December 2004 on the protection of animals during transport and related operations and amending Directives 64/432/EEC and 93/119/EC and Regulation (EC) No 1255/97, must be interpreted as meaning that it covers an activity, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, relating to the transport of stray dogs from one Member State to another by a charitable association in order to hand over those dogs to persons who have undertaken to adopt them after payment by those persons of a sum covering, in principle, the costs incurred for that purpose by that association.
2.The concept of ‘dealers engaging in intra-Community trade’ within the meaning of Article 12 of Council Directive 90/425/EEC of 26 June 1990 concerning veterinary and zoo technical checks applicable in intra-Community trade in certain live animals and products with a view to the completion of the internal market, as amended by Council Directive 92/60/EEC of 30 June 1992, must be interpreted as meaning that it covers inter alia, a charitable association which transports stray dogs from one Member State to another in order to give those dogs to persons who have agreed to adopt them after they have paid a sum covering in principle the costs incurred for that purpose by that association.
Language of the case: German
* * *
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 303, 8.9.2014.