- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-339/17: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Köln (Germany) lodged on 7 June 2017 — Verein für lauteren Wettbewerb e.V. v Princesport GmbH
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017CN0339
62017CN0339
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
28.8.2017
Official Journal of the European Union
C 283/23
(Case C-339/17)
(2017/C 283/32)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Verein für lauteren Wettbewerb e.V.
Defendant: Princesport GmbH
Questions referred
1.Is Article 7(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1007/2011 to be interpreted as meaning that it is mandatory to clarify that the product is a pure textile product exclusively composed of the same fibre?
2.Is use of one of the three terms mentioned in Article 7 of Regulation (EU) No 1007/2011, namely ‘100 %’, ‘pure’ or ‘all’, mandatory or is this merely an option, and not an obligation, for such products?
3.Does the obligation under Article 9(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1007/2011 to label a textile product or to mark it with the name and percentage by weight of all constituent fibres also apply to pure textile products coming under Article 7 of Regulation (EU) No 1007/2011?
Regulation (EU) No 1007/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 September 2011 on textile fibre names and related labelling and marking of the fibre composition of textile products and repealing Council Directive 73/44/EEC and Directives 96/73/EC and 2008/121/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ 2011 L 272, p. 1).
* * *
Language of the case: German.