Case C-333/09: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 27 November 2009 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil de prud’hommes de Caen — France) — Sophie Noël v SCP Brouard Daude, liquidator in the judicial liquidation of Pronuptia Boutiques Province SA, Centre de Gestion et d'Étude AGS IDF EST (Preliminary reference — European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms — International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights — Principle of equal treatment — Redundancy for economic reasons — No link with Community law — Lack of jurisdiction of the Court of Justice)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62009CB0333
62009CB0333
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union
(Case C-333/09) (Preliminary reference - European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms - International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights - Principle of equal treatment - Redundancy for economic reasons - No link with Community law - Lack of jurisdiction of the Court of Justice)
2010/C 51/27
Language of the case: French
Referring court
Conseil de prud’hommes of Caen — France
Parties to the main proceedings
Defendant: SCP Brouard Daude, liquidator in the judicial liquidation of Pronuptia Boutiques Province SA, Centre de Gestion et d'Étude AGS IDF EST
Re:
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Conseil de Prud’hommes (Labour Tribunal) of Caen (France) — Interpretation of Article 14 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms — Interpretation of Article 26 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights — Redundancy for economic reasons — Redundancy for personnel reasons — National provisions presumed contrary the abovementioned standards — Breach of the principle of equal treatment
Operative part
The Court of Justice of the European Communities clearly has no jurisdiction to answer the questions put by the Conseil de Prud’hommes of Caen by decision of 11 June 2009.
EurLex Case Law