- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-89/13: Order of the General Court of 16 September 2015 — Calestep v ECHA (REACH — Fee due for registration of a substance — Reduction granted to micro, small and medium-sized enterprises — Error in the declaration of the size of the undertaking — Decision imposing an administrative charge — Recommendation 2003/361/EC — Action manifestly devoid of any basis in law)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62013TB0089(01)
62013TB0089(01)
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 381/27
(Case T-89/13)(1)
((REACH - Fee due for registration of a substance - Reduction granted to micro, small and medium-sized enterprises - Error in the declaration of the size of the undertaking - Decision imposing an administrative charge - Recommendation 2003/361/EC - Action manifestly devoid of any basis in law))
(2015/C 381/28)
Language of the case: Spanish
Parties
Applicant: Calestep, SL (Estepa, Spain) (represented by: E. Cabezas Mateos, lawyer)
Defendant: European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) (represented by: M. Heikkilä, A. Iber and C. Schultheiss, acting as Agents, and C. Garcia Molyneux, lawyer)
Re:
Application for annulment of ECHA Decision SME (2012) 4028 of 21 December 2012, finding that the applicant does not satisfy the conditions to benefit from the reduced fees for small enterprises and imposing an administrative charge on it.
Operative part of the order
1.The action is dismissed.
2.Calestep, SL shall bear its own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), including those relating to the interim proceedings.
(1)
OJ C 108, 13.4.2013.