I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2015/C 073/61)
Language in which the application was lodged: Italian
Applicant: Internet Consulting GmbH (Brunico, Italy) (represented by: L. Miori and A. Bertella, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Autonomous Province of Bolzano-Alto Adige (Bolzano, Italy)
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Internet Consulting GmbH
Trade mark at issue: Word mark ‘SUEDTIROL’ — Community trade mark No 2 826 931
Procedure before OHIM: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity
Contested decision: Decision of the Grand Board of Appeal of OHIM of 10 October 2014 in Case R 574/2013-G
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—Annul or alter in full the contested decision of the Grand Board of Appeal of OHIM of 10 October 2014, notified on 13 November 2014, refusing in any event the application for a declaration of invalidity submitted by the Autonomous Province of Bolzano in respect of the Community trade mark Suedtirol;
—Order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings at first instance and on appeal before OHIM and the costs of the present proceedings.
—Infringement and/or misapplication of Articles 5 and 56 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009;
—Infringement and misapplication of Articles 7(1)(c), 12 and 52 of that regulation.