- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-158/16 P: Appeal brought on 14 March 2016 by Inge Barnett, Suzanne Ditlevsen, Annie Madsen against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 5 February 2016 in Case F-66/15, Barnett and others v EESC
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TN0158
62016TN0158
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
30.5.2016
Official Journal of the European Union
C 191/44
—
(Case T-158/16 P)
(2016/C 191/58)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Appellants: Inge Barnett (Roskilde, Denmark), Suzanne Ditlevsen (Copenhagen, Denmark), Annie Madsen (Frederiksberg, Denmark) (represented by: S. Orlandi and T. Martin, lawyers)
Other party to the proceedings: European Economic and Social Committee (EESC)
Form of order sought by the appellant
The appellants claim that the Court should:
—set aside the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal in Case F-66/15, Barnett and others v EESC;
giving judgment itself,
—annul the decisions contained in the pension slips of June 2014 by which the correction coefficient applicable to the applicants’ pensions is reduced from 1 January 2014;
—order the EESC to pay the costs in both sets of proceedings.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the appeal, the appellants rely on two pleas in law which are in essence identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-148/16 P, Barnett and Mogensen v Commission.
—