- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case F-143/15: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 18 July 2016 — Dietrich v Parliament (Civil service — Contract staff — Early termination of the contract — Expiry date of the notice period — Suspension of the notice period — New expiry date of the notice period — Act not having an adverse effect — Complaint lodged out of time — Plea of inadmissibility — Manifest inadmissibility — Article 83 of the Rules of Procedure)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62015FB0143
62015FB0143
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 364/57
(Case F-143/15) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
((Civil service - Contract staff - Early termination of the contract - Expiry date of the notice period - Suspension of the notice period - New expiry date of the notice period - Act not having an adverse effect - Complaint lodged out of time - Plea of inadmissibility - Manifest inadmissibility - Article 83 of the Rules of Procedure))
(2016/C 364/74)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Constant Dietrich (Pfulgriesheim, France) (represented by: A. Fombaron, lawyer)
Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: L. Deneys and E. Taneva, Agents)
Subject-matter of the case
Action for annulment of the decision rejecting the applicant’s complaint seeking annulment of the decision terminating early his employment at the European Parliament.
Operative part of the order
1)The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.
2)Constant Dietrich shall bear his own costs and shall pay the costs incurred by the European Parliament.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 68, 22.2.2016, p. 45.