- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-432/18: Action brought on 13 July 2018 — Palo v Commission
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018TN0432
62018TN0432
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
10.9.2018
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 319/23
(Case T-432/18)
(2018/C 319/27)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Peeter Palo (Tallinn, Estonia) (represented by: L. Levi and A. Blot, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
—annul the defendant’s decision of 5 October 2017 not to allocate the applicant the severance grant provided for under Article 12(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations;
—annul the defendant’s decision of 10 April 2018 rejecting the applicant’s complaint of 11 December 2017 directed against the abovementioned decision;
—order the defendant to compensate the applicant for the material damage suffered by the applicant;
—order the defendant to compensate the applicant for the non-material damage suffered by the applicant;
—order the defendant to bear all the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 12(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations.
2.Second plea in law, alleging infringement of the principles of equal treatment and non-discrimination.
3.Third plea in law, alleging infringement of the principle of legitimate expectations.
4.Fourth plea in law, alleging infringement of the principle of good administration and of the duty of care.