- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-564/19: Action brought on 14 August 2019 – Lozano Arana and Others v EUIPO – Coltejer (LIBERTADOR)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019TN0564
62019TN0564
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
7.10.2019
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 337/19
—
(Case T-564/19)
(2019/C 337/20)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicants: Antonio Lozano Arana (Cali, Colombia), Daniel Simon Benmaor (Marseille, France), Marion Esther Benmaor (Marseille), Valérie Brigitte Danielle Servant (Marrakech, Morocco) (represented by: M. Angelier, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Coltejer SA (Itagüí, Antioquia, Colombia)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Proprietors of the trade mark at issue: Applicants before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark LIBERTADOR – European Union trade mark No 9 067 414
Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 20 June 2019 in Case R 2482/2018-4
Form of order sought
The applicants claim that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of essential procedural requirements (right of defense, right to access to a judge);
—Infringement of Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
—