- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-563/18: Action brought on 21 September 2018 — YP v Commission
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018TN0563
62018TN0563
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
12.11.2018
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 408/59
(Case T-563/18)
(2018/C 408/76)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: YP (represented by: J.-N. Louis, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the Commission decision of 13 November 2017 not to promote her to grade AD 14;
—order the defendant to pay the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 45 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union and of the presumption of innocence.
2.Second plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 9(3) of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union.
3.Third plea in law, alleging infringement of the obligation to state reasons.