- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-81/22: Order of the General Court of 7 February 2023 — Euranimi v Commission (Action for annulment — Dumping — Imports of stainless steel cold-rolled flat products originating in India and Indonesia — Definitive anti-dumping duty — Act not of individual concern — Regulatory act entailing implementing measures — Inadmissibility)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TB0081
62022TB0081
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
27.3.2023
Official Journal of the European Union
C 112/35
(Case T-81/22) (*)
(Action for annulment - Dumping - Imports of stainless steel cold-rolled flat products originating in India and Indonesia - Definitive anti-dumping duty - Act not of individual concern - Regulatory act entailing implementing measures - Inadmissibility)
(2023/C 112/45)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: European Association of Non-Integrated Metal Importers & distributors (Euranimi) (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: M. Campa, D. Rovetta, P. Gjørtler and V. Villante, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: K. Blanck and G. Luengo, acting as Agents)
Re:
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant, an association representing the interests of European importers, distributors, traders and processors of unintegrated steel, stainless steel and metal products, seeks annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2012 of 17 November 2021 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and definitively collecting the provisional duty imposed on imports of stainless steel cold-rolled flat products originating in India and Indonesia (OJ 2021 L 410, p. 153).
Operative part of the order
1.The action is dismissed as inadmissible.
2.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the European Steel Association (Eurofer)’s application to intervene.
3.European Association of Non-Integrated Metal Importers & distributors (Euranimi) shall pay the costs.
4.Euranimi, the European Commission and Eurofer shall each bear their own costs relating to Eurofer’s application to intervene.
(*)
Language of the case: English.
ECLI:EU:C:2023:140