I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
2011/C 139/46
Language in which the application was lodged: Italian
Applicant: Zenato Azienda Vitivinicola Srl (Peschiera del Garda, Italy) (represented by: A. Rizzoli, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Camera di Commercio, Industria, Artigianato e Agricoltura di Verona (Verona, Italy)
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—declare the present action, together with the related annexes, admissible;
—annul the decision of the Board of Appeal (points 1, 2 and 3 of the operative part) in so far as it upholds the appeal, upholds the opposition and rejects in its entirety the application for registration, and orders the applicant to pay the costs incurred by the opposing party in the opposition and appeal proceedings;
—order OHIM to pay the costs.
Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant
Community trade mark concerned: Word mark ‘ZENATO RIPASSA’ (registration application No 5 848 015), for goods in Class 33 (alcoholic beverages)
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: La Camera di Commercio, Industria, Artigianato e Agricoltura di Verona
Mark or sign cited in opposition: Italian word mark ‘RIPASSO’ (No 682 213) for goods in Class 33 (‘Wines, spirits and liqueurs’)
Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition rejected
Decision of the Board of Appeal: To uphold the opposition and to reject in its entirety the application for registration
Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/09.