- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case F-93/11: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (2nd Chamber) of 21 March 2013 — Taghani v Commission (Civil service — Open competition — Selection board’s decision not to admit to the assessment tests — Remedies — Court action brought without waiting for a decision on the administrative complaint — Admissibility — Amendment of the competition notice after admission tests held — Principle of the protection of legitimate expectations — Legal certainty)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62011FA0093
62011FA0093
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
25.5.2013
Official Journal of the European Union
C 147/32
(Case F-93/11) (<span class="super">1</span>)
(Civil service - Open competition - Selection board’s decision not to admit to the assessment tests - Remedies - Court action brought without waiting for a decision on the administrative complaint - Admissibility - Amendment of the competition notice after admission tests held - Principle of the protection of legitimate expectations - Legal certainty)
2013/C 147/58
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Jamal Taghani (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Rodrigues and A. Blot, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and B. Eggers, Agents)
Re:
Application for annulment of the decision adopted by the chairman of the selection board for Competition EPSO/AST/111/10 — Secretaries (AST 1) not to admit the applicant to the assessment tests.
Operative part of the judgment
The Tribunal:
1.Annuls the decision of the selection board for open competition EPSO/AST/111/10, of 15 June 2011, not to admit Mr Taghani to the assessment tests;
2.Orders the European Commission to pay EUR 1 000 to Mr Taghani;
3.Dismisses the action as to the remainder;
4.Orders each party to bear its own costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 347, 26.11.2011, p. 46.