I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-235/15) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
((Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Documents held by the EMA and submitted in the context of the application for marketing authorisation for the medicinal product Vantobra - Decision to grant a third party access to the documents - Exception relating to the protection of commercial interests - No general presumption of confidentiality))
(2018/C 104/33)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Pari Pharma GmbH (Starnberg, Germany) (represented by: M. Epping and W. Rehmann, lawyers)
Defendant: European Medicines Agency (EMA) (represented by: T. Jabłoński, A. Rusanov, S. Marino, A. Spina and N. Rampal Olmedo, acting as Agents)
Interveners in support of the defendant: French Republic (represented by: D. Colas and J. Traband, acting as Agents) and Novartis Europharm Ltd (Camberley, United Kingdom) (represented by: C. Schoonderbeek, lawyer)
Action under Article 263 TFEU for the annulment of Decision EMA/271043/2015 of the EMA of 24 April 2015, granting to a third party, pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (OJ 2001 L 145, p. 43), access to documents containing information submitted in the context of an application for marketing authorisation for the medicinal product Vantobra.
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Pari Pharma GmbH to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Medicines Agency (EMA), including those relating to the application for interim measures;
3.Orders the French Republic to bear its own costs;
4.Orders Novartis Europharm Ltd to bear its own costs.
(<span class="note">1</span>) OJ C 221, 6.7.2015.