- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-184/15: Judgment of the General Court of 9 November 2016 — Trivisio Prototyping v Commission (Funding — Sixth framework programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities — Contracts concerning the projects ULTRA, CINeSPACE and IMPROVE — Partial reclassification of the action — Enforceable decision — Article 299 TFEU — Arbitration clause — Eligible costs — Recovery of sums paid)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62015TA0184
62015TA0184
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 6/34
(Case T-184/15)(Funding - Sixth framework programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities - Contracts concerning the projects ULTRA, CINeSPACE and IMPROVE - Partial reclassification of the action - Enforceable decision - Article 299 TFEU - Arbitration clause - Eligible costs - Recovery of sums paid)
(2017/C 006/41)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Trivisio Prototyping GmbH (Trier, Germany) (represented initially by A. Bartosch and A. Böhlke, and subsequently by A. Böhlke, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: S. Delaude and F. Moro, acting as agents, and R. van der Hout and S. Blazek, lawyers)
Re:
First, application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Commission Decision C(2015) 633 final of 2 February 2015 concerning recovery of the sum of EUR 385 112,19 together with interest and, second, application based on Article 272 TFEU seeking a declaration that the debt claimed by the Commission against Trivisio Prototyping is non-existent.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Trivisio Prototyping GmbH to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.
Language of the case: German.
(1) OJ C 262, 10.8.2015.