- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-800/17: Action brought on 11 December 2017 — Brown Street Holdings v EUIPO — Enesan (FIGHT LIFE)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017TN0800
62017TN0800
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
5.2.2018
Official Journal of the European Union
C 42/41
(Case T-800/17)
(2018/C 042/57)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Parties
Applicant: Brown Street Holdings Ltd (Auckland, New Zealand) (represented by: C. Hufnagel, M. Kleespies, A. Bender and J. Clayton-Chen, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Enesan AG (Zurich, Switzerland)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: International registration No 1 112 642 designating the European Union in respect of the word mark ‘FIGHT LIFE’
Proceedings before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 26 September 2017 in Case R 36/2017-2
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of the second sentence of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009;
—Infringement of the first sentence of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009;
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.