I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
2012/C 295/46
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: Knauf Insulation Technology (Visé, Belgium) (represented by: K. Manhaeve, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Saint Gobain Cristaleria, SL (Madrid, Spain)
—Annul the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 4 May 17 April 2012 in case R 259/2011-5 insofar as it has declared the opponent’s opposition successful against the CTM application for part of the goods and services applied for;
—Order the defendant and — if applicable — the Opponent to jointly and severally pay all the costs.
Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant
Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘ECOSE’, for goods and services in classes 1, 2, 3, 16, 17, 19, 20 and 40 — Community trade mark application No W00993849
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Mark or sign cited in opposition: Spanish trade mark registration No 2556409 of the word mark ‘ECOSEC FACHADAS’, for goods in classes 17 and 19
Decision of the Opposition Division: Upheld the opposition for part of the contested goods
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Partially annulled the contested decision and dismissed the appeal and confirmed the contested decision for the remainder
Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 207/2009