- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-33/24, ROSAS: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék (Hungary) lodged on 18 January 2024 — ROSAS Logisztikai Kft. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024CN0033
62024CN0033
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
EN
Series C
C/2024/2017
(Case C-33/24, ROSAS)
(C/2024/2017)
Language of the case: Hungarian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: ROSAS Logisztikai Kft.
Defendant: Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága
Question referred
Must Article 173(3) of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) laying down the Union Customs Code be interpreted as meaning that it allows an indirect customs representative — identified as such as a result of a typographical error — acting as customs declarant to amend a customs declaration already lodged and verified after the goods in question have been released for free circulation, so that, by changing the representative status code, he or she subsequently becomes the direct representative?
(1) OJ 2013 L 269, p. 1.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2017/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)