EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-23/23: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2024 – European Commission v Republic of Malta (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Directive 2009/147/EC – Conservation of wild birds – Article 5, Article 8(1) and Article 9(1) – Derogation scheme allowing the live-capturing of seven species of wild finches – Member States’ power of derogation for research purposes – Conditions)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023CA0023

62023CA0023

September 19, 2024
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C series

C/2024/6388

(Case C-23/23)

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 2009/147/EC - Conservation of wild birds - Article 5, Article 8(1) and Article 9(1) - Derogation scheme allowing the live-capturing of seven species of wild finches - Member States’ power of derogation for research purposes - Conditions)

(C/2024/6388)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: C. Hermes and R. Lindenthal, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Republic of Malta (represented by: A. Buhagiar, acting as Agent, assisted by D. Sarmiento Ramírez-Escudero, abogado)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Declares that, by adopting a derogation scheme allowing the live-capturing of seven species of wild finches, namely the chaffinch, (Fringilla coelebs), the linnet (Carduelis cannabina), the goldfinch (Carduelis carduelis), the greenfinch (Carduelis chloris), the hawfinch (Coccothraustes coccothraustes), the serin (Serinus serinus) and the siskin (Carduelis spinus), the Republic of Malta has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 5 and Article 8(1) of Directive 2009/147/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 on the conservation of wild birds, read in conjunction with Article 9(1) of that directive;

2.Orders the Republic of Malta to pay the costs.

Language of the case: English.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6388/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia