I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 2009/147/EC - Conservation of wild birds - Article 5, Article 8(1) and Article 9(1) - Derogation scheme allowing the live-capturing of seven species of wild finches - Member States’ power of derogation for research purposes - Conditions)
(C/2024/6388)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: European Commission (represented by: C. Hermes and R. Lindenthal, acting as Agents)
Defendant: Republic of Malta (represented by: A. Buhagiar, acting as Agent, assisted by D. Sarmiento Ramírez-Escudero, abogado)
The Court:
1.Declares that, by adopting a derogation scheme allowing the live-capturing of seven species of wild finches, namely the chaffinch, (Fringilla coelebs), the linnet (Carduelis cannabina), the goldfinch (Carduelis carduelis), the greenfinch (Carduelis chloris), the hawfinch (Coccothraustes coccothraustes), the serin (Serinus serinus) and the siskin (Carduelis spinus), the Republic of Malta has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 5 and Article 8(1) of Directive 2009/147/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 on the conservation of wild birds, read in conjunction with Article 9(1) of that directive;
2.Orders the Republic of Malta to pay the costs.
—
Language of the case: English.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6388/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—