- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-1124/23: Action brought on 29 November 2023 — Dyadema v EUIPO — Pegador (PEGADOR)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023TN1124
62023TN1124
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
EN
Series C
C/2024/966
(Case T-1124/23)
(C/2024/966)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Dyadema Srl (San Zenone degli Ezzelini, Italy) (represented by: F. Celluprica, F. Fischetti and F. De Bono, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Pegador GmbH (Emsdetten, Germany)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark PEGADOR — Application for registration No 18 511 714
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 13 September 2023 in Case R 331/2023-2
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs, including the costs relating to the earlier stages of the proceedings.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/966/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)