- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-74/17: Action brought on 6 February 2017 — Danjaq v EUIPO — Formosan (Shaken, not stirred)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017TN0074
62017TN0074
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
18.4.2017
Official Journal of the European Union
C 121/36
(Case T-74/17)
(2017/C 121/53)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Danjaq, LLC (Los Angeles, California, United States) (represented by: S. Baran and G. Messenger, barristers, D. Stone and A. Dykes, solicitors)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Formosan IP (Oxford, United Kingdom)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘Shaken, not stirred’ — Application for registration No 13 406 343
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of in Case R 255/2016-4
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO and the intervener bear their own costs and pay those of the applicant.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 8(4) of Regulation No 207/2009.