EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-290/09: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo per la Sardegna (Italy), lodged on 27 July 2009 — Telecom Italia SpA v Regione autonoma della Sardegna

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62009CN0290

62009CN0290

January 1, 2009
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

26.9.2009

Official Journal of the European Union

C 233/10

(Case C-290/09)

(2009/C 233/16)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Claimant: Telecom Italia SpA

Defendant: Regione autonoma della Sardegna

Questions referred

1.Must the provisions of Directive 2004/18/EC (1) on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts that are referred to in section 10 [of the order for reference] be interpreted as precluding a temporary grouping of undertakings, the members of which include a State agency of the kind described in section 12 [of the order for reference], from taking part in a tendering procedure for the award of a contract for a service such as the documentation, dissemination and implementation of the ‘Homogeneous System of Visual Identity of the Cultural Sites and Institutions: Cultural Heritage of Sardinia’, the subject of the tendering procedure advertised by the Sardinia Region?

2.Are the provisions of Italian law contained in Article 3(22) and (19) of the Public Contracts Code, enacted by Legislative Decree No 163/2006 (which provide, respectively, that ‘the term “economic operator” shall include a contractor, supplier, service provider or a group or consortium of these’ and ‘the terms “contractor”, “supplier” and “service provider” shall mean any natural or legal person, or body without legal personality, including a European Economic Interest Group (EEIG) formed pursuant to Legislative Decree No 240 of 23 July 1991, which “offers on the market”, respectively, the execution of works or a work, the supply of products or the provision of services’), and in Article 34 of that Public Contracts Code (which lists the entities allowed to participate in public procurement procedures) contrary to Directive 2004/18/EC if interpreted as restricting participation in tendering procedures to professional providers of such services and as excluding public entities the primary objects of which are not-for-profit, such as research?

(1) OJ 2004 L 134, p. 114.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia