- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-74/23: Judgment of the General Court of 7 February 2024 — Oriflame Cosmetics v EUIPO — Caramé (O) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark O — Earlier international registration in respect of the figurative mark O — Relative grounds for refusal — No genuine use of the earlier mark — Article 42(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 47(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023TA0074
62023TA0074
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
C/2024/2303
(Case T-74/23) (*)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - International registration designating the European Union - Figurative mark O - Earlier international registration in respect of the figurative mark O - Relative grounds for refusal - No genuine use of the earlier mark - Article 42(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 47(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
(C/2024/2303)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Oriflame Cosmetics AG (Schaffhausen, Switzerland) (represented by: N. Gerling and U. Pfleghar, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: T. Klee, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Caramé Holding AG (Sulzbach, Germany) (represented by: M. Ebner and R. Lange, lawyers)
Re:
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment and the alteration of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 7 December 2022 (Case R 938/2022-2).
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 7 December 2022 (R 938/2022-2);
2.Dismisses the action as to the remainder;
3.Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay half of those incurred by Oriflame Cosmetics AG;
4.Orders Caramé Holding AG to bear its own costs and to pay half of those incurred by Oriflame Cosmetics.
*
(*) OJ C 121, 3.4.2023.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2303/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
END