- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 8 July 2010. # Strålfors AB v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM). # Action for annulment - Application initiating proceedings - Formal requirements - Manifest inadmissibility. # Case T-211/10.
ECLI:EU:T:2010:301
62010TO0211
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-211/10)
Action for annulment – Application initiating proceedings – Formal requirements – Manifest inadmissibility
Procedure – Application initiating proceedings – Formal requirements – Brief summary of the pleas in law on which the application is based – Pleas in law not set out in the application – Reference to the whole of the annexes – Inadmissibility (Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 21, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 44(1)(c)) (see paras 5-7)
Re:
ACTION against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 25 January 2010 (Case R 1111/2009-2), concerning an application for registration of word sign ID SOLUTIONS as a Community trade mark.
Information relating to the case
Applicant for the Community trade mark:
Community trade mark sought:
Word mark ID SOLUTIONS for goods in Class 16 – Community trade mark application No – 8235202
Decision of the examiner:
Registration partially refused
Decision of the Board of Appeal:
Dismissal of the appeal and confirmation of the contested decision