I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
(C/2024/2785)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: KnitPro International (Jaipur, India) (represented by: S. Malynicz, Barrister-at-Law)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Crafts Americana Group, Inc. (Vancouver, Washington, United States)
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark (Representation of chevrons between two parallel lines) – European Union trade mark No 8 884 264
Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Grand Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 15 December 2023 in Case R 2672/2017-G (RENV)
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—declare that the appeal is manifestly well founded;
—alternatively, that the cancellation application as it is based on Article 7(1)(a) and (b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council is dismissed;
—order EUIPO and the interveners, if they take part in the proceedings, to pay the costs of the applicant for annulment, and bear their own costs.
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2785/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—