- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-50/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Aosta (Italy) lodged on 30 January 2013 — Rocco Papalia v Comune di Aosta
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62013CN0050
62013CN0050
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
25.5.2013
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 147/3
(Case C-50/13)
2013/C 147/06
Language of the case: Italian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Rocco Papalia
Defendant: Comune di Aosta
Question referred
Must Directive 1999/70/EC (Article 1, along with Clause 5 of the annexed framework agreement, as well as any other provision in any way connected or linked) be interpreted as permitting a situation in which a worker who has been recruited by a public body on a fixed-term contract, without the requirements laid down by the above Community rules being satisfied, is entitled to compensation in respect of damage only if he proves that such damage actually exists, and thus only if he provides positive, including presumptive, evidence, but at any rate specific evidence, that he has had to forgo other, better, employment opportunities?
Language of the case: Italian
* * *
(1) OJ 1999 L 175, p. 43.