- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 8 July 2010. # Nadine Trautwein Rolf Trautwein GbR, Research and Development v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM). # Community trade mark - Application for a Community figurative mark representing a dog - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009). # Case T-385/08.
ECLI:EU:T:2010:295
62008TJ0385
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-385/08)
Community trade mark – Application for a Community figurative mark representing a dog – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Absolute grounds for refusal – Marks composed exclusively of signs or indications which may serve to designate the characteristics of goods (Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 7(1)(c)) (see paras 23, 27-30)
Re:
ACTION brought against the decision of 30 June 2008 of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM (Case R 1734/2007-1) concerning an application for registration as a Community trade mark of a figurative sign representing a dog.
Information relating to the case
Applicant for the Community trade mark:
Community trade mark sought:
Representation of a dog for goods in Classes 18, 25 and 31 – Application No 4829321
Decision of the examiner:
Registration refused
Decision of the Board of Appeal:
Annulment of the contested decision as regards ‘clothing, footwear and headgear; belts’ in Class 25
Operative part
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Nadine Trautwein Rolf Trautwein GbR, Research and Development to pay the costs.