I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Joined Cases C-54/10 P and C-55/10 P)
(Appeal - Community trade mark - Refusal to register signs ‘350’, ‘250’, ‘150’, ‘222’, ‘333’ and ‘555’ as trade marks for periodicals, books and game booklets - Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Article 7(1)(c) - Descriptive character - Obligation on OHIM to take account of its earlier decision-making practice)
2011/C 340/07
Language of the case: Polish
Appellant: Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol sp. z o.o. (represented by: D. Rzążewska, radca prawny)
Other party to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Botis, Agent)
Appeal brought against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber) of 19 November 2009 in Joined Cases T-64/07 to T-66/07 Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol v OHIM, by which that Court dismissed the three actions brought against the decisions of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 21 December 2006 (Cases R 1033/2006-4, R 1034/2006-4 and R 1035/2006-4) concerning applications for registration of the word marks 150, 250 and 350 as Community trade marks — Breach of Articles 7(1)(c) and 76 of Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1), as replaced by Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1) — Descriptive character of marks composed exclusively of figures.
1.The appeals are dismissed.
Language of the case: Polish
* * *
(1) OJ C 113, 1.5.2010.