EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-799/17: Judgment of the General Court of 2 February 2022 — Scania and Others v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Truck manufacturers market — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and of Article 53 of the EEA Agreement — Agreements and concerted practices in relation to the prices of trucks, the timing for the introduction of emission technologies and the passing on to customers of the costs relating to those technologies — ‘Hybrid’ procedure staggered over time — Presumption of innocence — Principle of impartiality — Charter of Fundamental Rights — Single and continuous infringement — Restriction of competition by object — Geographic scope of the infringement — Fine — Proportionality — Equal treatment — Unlimited jurisdiction)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017TA0799

62017TA0799

February 2, 2022
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

21.3.2022

Official Journal of the European Union

C 128/14

(Case T-799/17) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)

(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Truck manufacturers market - Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and of Article 53 of the EEA Agreement - Agreements and concerted practices in relation to the prices of trucks, the timing for the introduction of emission technologies and the passing on to customers of the costs relating to those technologies - ‘Hybrid’ procedure staggered over time - Presumption of innocence - Principle of impartiality - Charter of Fundamental Rights - Single and continuous infringement - Restriction of competition by object - Geographic scope of the infringement - Fine - Proportionality - Equal treatment - Unlimited jurisdiction)

(2022/C 128/19)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Scania AB (Södertälje, Sweden), Scania CV AB (Södertälje), Scania Deutschland GmbH (Koblenz, Germany) (represented by: D. Arts, F. Miotto, C. Pommiès, K. Schillemans, C. Langenius, L. Ulrichs, P. Hammarskiöld, S. Falkner and N. De Backer, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: M. Farley and L. Wildpanner, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Commission Decision C(2017) 6467 final of 27 September 2017, relating to proceedings under Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area (EEA) (Case AT.39824 — Trucks) or, in the alternative, a reduction of the fines imposed on the applicants in that decision.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Dismisses the action;

2.Orders Scania AB, Scania CV AB and Scania Deutschland GmbH to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.

(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 42, 5.2.2018.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia