- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-896/16: Action brought on 20 December 2016 — Puma v EUIPO — Senator (TRINOMIC)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TN0896
62016TN0896
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 53/39
(Case T-896/16)
(2017/C 053/47)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Parties
Applicant: Puma SE (Herzogenaurach, Germany) (represented by: M. Schunke, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Senator GmbH & Co. KGaA (Groß-Bieberau, Germany)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘TRINOMIC’ — Application No 12 697 074
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 19 October 2016 in Case R 70/2016-4
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings, including those incurred in the appeal proceedings.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;
—Infringement of the principle of equal treatment and of the principle that the administration is bound by its own decisions.