- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-42/13: Order of the General Court of 19 November 2013 — 1. garantovaná v Commission (Action for annulment — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for calcium carbide and magnesium for the steel and gas industries in the EEA, with the exception of Ireland, Spain, Portugal and the United Kingdom — Fines — Late-payment interest — Act not amenable to review — Inadmissibility)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62013TB0042
62013TB0042
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
18.1.2014
Official Journal of the European Union
C 15/17
(Case T-42/13)(Action for annulment - Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Market for calcium carbide and magnesium for the steel and gas industries in the EEA, with the exception of Ireland, Spain, Portugal and the United Kingdom - Fines - Late-payment interest - Act not amenable to review - Inadmissibility)
2014/C 15/24
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: 1. garantovaná a.s. (Bratislava, Slovakia) (represented: initially by M. Powell, Solicitor, G. Forwood, Barrister, M. Staroň and P. Hodál, lawyers, and subsequently by K. Lasok QC, J. Holmes, B. Hartnett, Barristers, and O. Geiss, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: V. Bottka, F. Dintilhac and N. von Lingen, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application for annulment of the decision allegedly contained in the Commission’s letter of 21 December 2012 (Case COMP/39.396 — Calcium carbide and magnesium based reagents for the steel and gas industries), whereby the Commission asked the applicant to pay the outstanding amount of the fine imposed by Commission decision C(2009) 5791 final of 22 July 2009 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement, together with late-payment interest, or to provide the Commission with a bank guarantee covering that amount.
Operative part of the order
1.The action is dismissed.
Language of the case: English.
(1) OJ C 79, 16.3.2013.