- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-99/21 P: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 30 June 2022 — Danske Slagtermestre v European Commission, Kingdom of Denmark (Appeal — State aid — Article 107(1) TFEU — Contributions scheme for the collection of waste water — Complaint — Decision finding that there is no State aid — Action for annulment — Admissibility — Locus standi — Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU — Regulatory act not entailing implementing measures — Direct concern)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021CA0099
62021CA0099
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 318/10
(Case C-99/21 P) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Appeal - State aid - Article 107(1) TFEU - Contributions scheme for the collection of waste water - Complaint - Decision finding that there is no State aid - Action for annulment - Admissibility - Locus standi - Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU - Regulatory act not entailing implementing measures - Direct concern)
(2022/C 318/12)
Language of the case: Danish
Parties
Appellant: Danske Slagtermestre (represented by: H. Sønderby Christensen, advokat)
Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: L. Grønfeldt and P. Němečková, acting as Agents), Kingdom of Denmark (represented by: J. Nymann-Lindegren, V. Pasternak Jørgensen, M. Søndahl Wolff and L. Teilgård, acting as Agents)
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Sets aside the order of the General Court of the European Union of 1 December 2020, Danske Slagtermestre v Commission (T-486/18, not published, EU:T:2020:576);
2.Declares the appeal at first instance admissible;
3.Refers the case back to the General Court of the European Union for it to rule on the merits;
4.Reserves the costs.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 182, 10.5.2021.
* * *
Language of the case: Danish