I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU word mark PREDATOR - Earlier EU word mark PREDATOR - Relative ground for invalidity - Likelihood of confusion - Complementarity and similarity of the goods - Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
(C/2025/549)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Domator24 sp. z o.o. (Zielona Góra, Poland) (represented by: T. Gawliczek, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Ivanauskas and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Acer, Inc. (Taipei, Taiwan) (represented by: R. Schiffer, lawyer)
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 9 November 2022 (Case R 381/2022-5).
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Domator24 sp. z o.o. to pay the costs.
—
Language of the case: English
(1) OJ C 94, 13.3.2023.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/549/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—
* * *