- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-495/06 P: Order of the Court of 25 October 2007 — Bart Nijs v Court of Auditors of the European Communities (Appeal — Promotion — 2003 promotion procedure — Staff report — Decision establishing the definitive version of the report — Decision to promote another official to the grade of Translator-reviser — Claim for compensation for damage — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62006CB0495
62006CB0495
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
26.1.2008
Official Journal of the European Union
C 22/18
(Case C-495/06 P)
(Appeal - Promotion - 2003 promotion procedure - Staff report - Decision establishing the definitive version of the report - Decision to promote another official to the grade of Translator-reviser - Claim for compensation for damage - Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)
(2008/C 22/35)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Bart Nijs (represented by: F. Rollinger, avocat)
Other party to the proceedings: Court of Auditors of the European Communities (represented by: T. Kennedy, Agent)
Re:
Appeal brought against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber) of 3 October 2006 in Case T-171/05 Bart Nijs v Court of Auditors, in which the Court of First Instance dismissed — in so far as it relied on grounds other than a failure to give reasons — the action seeking, first, annulment of the decision establishing the definitive version of the appellant's staff report for the 2003 reporting period, the decision allocating the appellant merit points for the 2003 reporting period and the decision not to promote him in 2004, and of the decision rejecting the complaint brought against those decisions and, secondly, an application for compensation in respect of the harm suffered
Operative part of the order
The Court:
1.Dismisses the appeal;
2.Orders Mr Nijs to pay the costs.
* * *
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 42, 24.2.2007.